Pin it! 
Springer781, kmill, Nickolas likes this
It does have interesting implications; I wonder how far the DOJ will take this idea. And will things have to get worse before they can get better? Probably.
I could worry about it right now, but this evening I'll ponder the deliciousness of Angel's Envy instead.
7 comments
Login to comment →
MacTexas 10 years, 10 months ago
I wonder what the definition of "hateful" is?
Reply
Chet_Manly 10 years, 10 months ago
Exactly what I thought. With a bureaucracy like we have there is great power in being able to define things such as "hateful" or "extremist". Suspend due process and we will be in quite a tyrannical pickle.
Reply
CharlesWGriswold 10 years, 10 months ago
Makes you wonder if they will also prosecute hateful rhetoric *from* Muslims that “edges towards violence”.
Yeah, probably not.
Reply
hawkman 10 years, 10 months ago
If similar comments were made about Christians were made, would the rhetoric hold true? Oh that's right...it is OK to say hateful things towards Christians. My bad.
Reply
Paladin 10 years, 10 months ago
This government has no concept of hypocrisy.
Reply
Todd73 10 years, 9 months ago
This is what a totalitarian dicktator sounds like. (hope I spelled that correctly)
Reply
Chet_Manly 10 years, 9 months ago
Ha. I'd say you nailed it.
Reply