Elementary New Sherlock Holmes
Posted by wayndres from www.cbs.com
Pin it! 
kevinfjames, pastorjamesburke, macbaker and 4 others like this
Current Day Sherlock Holmes series with a twist: It's current day and Watson is a women. Really flows and keeps your attention.
10 comments
Login to comment →
pastorjamesburke 12 years ago
Watson is only one woman. I'm sure you may feel she represents women, though.
Reply
glen 12 years ago
I saw the previews for this show today and it looked really interesting. Looking forward to checking it out.
Reply
tinman97030 12 years ago
have always been a fan of Holmes and Watson, in all the incarnations. It was hard to let go of Basil until Robert Downey came onto the scene of the crime.
Reply
57plymouth 12 years ago
Of all the interpretations of Holmes, this one is the absolute worst. I watched the first episode, I'm done. The Holmes in the CBS show is a drug addict with a live-in psychiatrist/counselor who stumbles into the solution almost by accident. It's just awful.
The BBC reboot is much better.
Reply
glen 12 years ago
@tinman97030 AGREED. I love the new movies.
Reply
Dirty_Left_83 12 years ago
In my humble opinion, Jeremy Brett will always be the greatest Sherlock Holmes. This latest reincarnation is interesting with the introduction of a female Watson. The first episode did not blow me away but the 2nd & 3rd were very entertaining. I like Johnny Lee Miller as Holmes and Lucy Liu is as gorgeous as ever. I am eager to see where their relationship goes later in the season. The recovering drug addict Holmes is a new twist. I will continue to watch.
Reply
MWolff 12 years ago
Lucy Liu is the shit
Reply
kilroy182 12 years ago
Wasn't a fan after the first episode, but the latest one was pretty good. It's a bit like athlete's foot, It grows on you, and it's an itch you just have to scratch.
Reply
iamkevinthompson 12 years ago
Love this show, definitely a new favorite.
Reply
Cobrapilot 12 years ago
Why bother with this horrible interpretation of Holmes, when the BBC's "Sherlock" is so brilliant?
Reply